Hi Charles,
Please would you consider the following. Absolutely no rush if it's too late for this development cycle.
For the 'Date published' field if you group-by-first-letters it is equivalent to grouping by millennium which probably isn't very meaningful for most book collections, or is it :)? Would you consider making it mean group by decade instead (e.g. 1960-69, 1970-79 etc.) In other words, something like you did for the Pages and Words custom columns.
Please would you consider the following. Absolutely no rush if it's too late for this development cycle.
For the 'Date published' field if you group-by-first-letters it is equivalent to grouping by millennium which probably isn't very meaningful for most book collections, or is it :)? Would you consider making it mean group by decade instead (e.g. 1960-69, 1970-79 etc.) In other words, something like you did for the Pages and Words custom columns.