Good evening,
I've been dealing with an issue for the last couple of years, and was wondering if anyone had a solution for me.
I use Calibre on my local machine and I sync my calibre library to box.com so that if something ever happens to my local drive (has before, will again) I have an online backup. I also like the fact that with box sync that as I update the updates sync online automatically without me thinking about it.
Here is where the problem comes in. I want to edit my library on multiple computers. This has worked in the past however there has been an issue that I am trying to overcome.
Syncing between multiple computers using box.com as the intermediary - What sometimes happens is that PC A (A) gets updated. It then updates Box.com (B), which then downloads to PC C (C). Somewhere in the mix A updates B when C has already updated B, instead of B updating A from the updates it got from C.
How can I force the most recent copy to update the older copies without causing confusion? I don't want A to update B when B is newer and when B should be updating A instead.
Thoughts? Ideas? HELP!!!!:help::help::help::help::help:
Thank you.
Chris aka Naloomi
Image may be NSFW.I've been dealing with an issue for the last couple of years, and was wondering if anyone had a solution for me.
I use Calibre on my local machine and I sync my calibre library to box.com so that if something ever happens to my local drive (has before, will again) I have an online backup. I also like the fact that with box sync that as I update the updates sync online automatically without me thinking about it.
Here is where the problem comes in. I want to edit my library on multiple computers. This has worked in the past however there has been an issue that I am trying to overcome.
Syncing between multiple computers using box.com as the intermediary - What sometimes happens is that PC A (A) gets updated. It then updates Box.com (B), which then downloads to PC C (C). Somewhere in the mix A updates B when C has already updated B, instead of B updating A from the updates it got from C.
How can I force the most recent copy to update the older copies without causing confusion? I don't want A to update B when B is newer and when B should be updating A instead.
Thoughts? Ideas? HELP!!!!:help::help::help::help::help:
Thank you.
Chris aka Naloomi
Clik here to view.
